The Living Place and Social Class Connection

The Living Place and Social Class Connection

Social psychologists and geologists have started to examine the shifting form of attachment to a location in modern cities in advanced industrial nations in a recent resurrection of an earlier tradition of community surveys. When individuals interact with others from areas with which they have a connection, it can help to clear the ice and generate a feeling of attachment among those meeting for the first time (The Open University, 2021a). This implies that individuals who live in the same area share a common identity or a sense of shared connection. This paper is written with the aim of studying the relationship between place and class, namely, whether moving to a larger city affects the standard of living.

The sense of common connectedness that locations may evoke frequently conceals connection problems and the ways in which individuals, apparently living cheek-by-jowl inside the same apartment building, are divided. People may shape places in the same way that places shape the personalities of individuals in how they connect, their interests, and their methods of functioning together or separately (The Open University, 2021a). Thus, people can already talk about the relationship between class and place.

To get a sense of the magnitude of these alterations, people should look at the available statistics on where people resided and how that evolved throughout the nineteenth century; this is not as simple as it appears. It was frequently difficult to pinpoint where individuals resided. The majority of the population increase occurred in urban areas, with many people living in deplorable conditions (Dixon & Hinchliffe, 2014, p. 83). On the other hand, cities are spreading out, with farmland and country estates giving place to suburban development for the expanding middle classes.

Because the modern world is characterized by movement and new relationships, such as the movement of people across boundaries and between nations, as well as the pace and availability of communications infrastructure, being linked has become a severe issue for social scientists. Equally concerning has been the realization that ties may be severed, relationships can be severed, and much of what is considered forgiven about people’s intertwined lives might start to unravel.

At this stage of the essay, it can already be confirmed that the connection between place and class exists. In most countries, people from small towns and villages are trying to move to large cities for a better life (Dixon & Hinchliffe, 2014, p. 83). Unfortunately, states cannot provide the same standard of living everywhere. The level of medicine, salaries, and infrastructure can be an order of magnitude lower than the nearest large city (Clarke & Woodward, 2014, p. 173). The process of moving people and integrating small villages into the city is called urbanization.

Urbanization describes the growth of cities, the changes in where and how people live, and the experiences of living in an urbanized society. This process went hand in hand with industrialization, as people flocked from the countryside to the cities to work in factories and mills. Both urbanization and industrialization involved disruption to people’s lives and their existing connections to each other and places (Dixon & Hinchliffe, 2014, p. 83). Processes produced significant inequalities within and between cities.

The process of urbanization has recently been gaining momentum, and the line between classes is thereby blurred; however, this does not mean that the place does not affect the class in any way. On the contrary, the place plays a critical role in establishing the standard of living, thereby forcing a large number of people to move to the capital or other large and industrial cities. Urbanization is not a flawed process; it is an opportunity to give people the most favorable living conditions, however, with its drawbacks in the form of a harmful environmental situation.

It is not always simple to distinguish between the physical and social features of bodies. Some people are judged more beautiful than others, and they feature on television and in mainstream culture, as well as receiving financial compensation. Physical fitness is undoubtedly more important in some parts of society than in others (Clarke & Woodward, 2014, p. 173). Top athletes, for instance, are commonly described by their athletic capabilities. Bodies exist in a variety of forms and sizes, but societal values play a significant role in determining which bodies are more appreciated and regarded as more handsome than others (The Open University, 2021b). Individuals rely on having good bodies that can function in specific ways for a living. This once again confirms the fact that the connection between place and class is much stronger than it seems at f